LIBERTAS PRAESTANTISSIMUM PDF
Encyclical: Libertas Praestantissimum-On Human Liberty [Pope Leo XIII] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Liberty—one of the world’s most. Encyclical on Human Liberty, one of the world’s most misunderstood concepts is put into its true Catholic perspective. Season 4, Popes Against the Modern Errors, Episode 4: Libertas Praestantissimum. by Member Supported Restoration Radio · May 20,
|Published (Last):||2 September 2004|
|PDF File Size:||3.48 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.17 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
But man is praestantissi,um nature rational. Augustine says to overlook and leave unpunished many things which are punished, and rightly, by Divine Providence. Wherefore, if such tolerance would be injurious to the public welfare, and entail greater evils on the State, it would not be lawful; for in such case the motive of good is wanting.
Libertas Praestantissimum Archives – Jon Haines
Man must, therefore, take his standard of a loyal and religious life from the eternal law; and from all and every one of praestantiswimum laws which God, in His infinite wisdom and power, has been pleased to enact, and to make known to us by such clear and unmistakable signs as to leave no room for doubt.
Not that the divine assistance hinders in any way the free movement of our will; just the contrary, for grace works inwardly in man and in harmony with his natural inclinations, since it flows from the very Creator libertaas his mind and will, by whom all things are moved in conformity with their nature.
Religion, of its essence, is wonderfully helpful to the State. In other words, the good wished by the will is necessarily good in so far as it is known by the intellect; and this the more, because in all voluntary acts choice is subsequent to a judgment upon the truth of the good presented, declaring praestantissimun which good preference should be given.
Now, since everything chosen as a means is viewed as good or useful, and since good, as such, is the proper object of our desire, it follows that freedom of choice is a property of the will, or, rather, is identical with the will in so far as it has in its action the faculty of choice.
It follows, therefore, that the law of nature is the same thing as the eternal lawimplanted in rational creatures, and inclining them to their right action and end ; and can be nothing else but the eternal reason of God, the Creator and Ruler of all the world. For right is a moral power which – as We have before said and must again and again repeat – it is absurd to suppose that nature has accorded indifferently to truth and falsehood, to justice and injustice.
The fruit, instead of being sweet and wholesome, has proved cankered and bitter.
And deservedly so; for this Libertws liberty bears witness to the absolute and most just dominion of God over man, and to the chief and supreme duty of man toward God.
Whenever there exists, or there is reason to fear, an unjust oppression of the people on the one hand, or a deprivation of the liberty of the Church on the other, it is lawful to seek for such a change of government as will bring about due liberty of action.
From this it follows, as is evident, that the liberty of which We have been speaking is greatly opposed to reason, and tends absolutely to pervert men’s minds, in as much as it claims for itself the right of teaching whatever it pleases – a liberty which the State cannot grant without failing in its duty.
This harmony has been not inaptly compared to that which exists between the body and the soul for the well-being of both one and the other, the separation of which libertaw irremediable harm to the body, since it extinguishes its very life.
Such an opinion is sound, if it is to be understood of some equitable adjustment consistent with truth and justice; in so far, namely, that the Church, in the hope of some great good, may show herself indulgent, and may conform to the times in so far as her sacred office permits.
First of all, there must be law ; that is, a fixed rule of teaching what is to be done and what is to be left undone. And now to reduce for clearness’ sake to its principal heads all that has been set forth with its immediate conclusions, the summing up in this briefly: From what has been said it follows that it is quite unlawful to demand, to defend, or to grant unconditional freedom of thought, of speech, or writing, or of worship, as if these were so many rights given by nature to man.
But the absurdity of such a position is manifest. And although in the extraordinary condition of these times the Church usually acquiesces praestnatissimum certain modern liberties, not because she prefers them in themselves, but because she judges it expedient to permit them, she would in happier times exercise her own liberty; and, by persuasion, exhortation, and entreaty would endeavor, as praestantidsimum is bound, to fulfill the duty assigned to her by God of providing for the eternal salvation of mankind.
Thus, truth being gradually obscured by darkness, pernicious and manifold error, as too often happens, will easily prevail.
Season 4, Popes Against the Modern Errors, Episode 4: Libertas Praestantissimum – True Restoration
In such case, an excessive and vicious liberty is not sought, but only some relief, for the common welfare, in order that, while license for evil is allowed by the State, the power of doing good may praestantissimim be hindered. The fundamental doctrine of rationalism is the supremacy of the human reason, which, refusing due submission to the divine and eternal reason, proclaims its own independence, and constitutes itself the supreme principle and source and judge of truth.
On the other hand, as was said above, he who is free can either act or not act, can do this or do that, as he pleases, because his judgment precedes his choice. Hence the doctrine of the supremacy of praestanttissimum greater number, praestantossimum that all right and all duty reside in the majority.
But the will cannot proceed to act until it is enlightened by the knowledge possessed by the intellect.
Libertas Praestantissimum Archives – Jon Haines
And, first, let us examine that liberty in individuals which is so opposed to the virtue of religion, namely, the liberty of worshipas it is called. The hope has been disappointed by the result.
Indeed, if what they say were really true, there would be no tyranny, no matter how monstrous, which we should not be bound to endure and submit to. In regard, however, to all matter of opinion which God leaves to man’s free discussion, full liberty of thought and of speech is naturally within the right of everyone; for such liberty never leads men to suppress the truth, but often to discover it and make it known. To refute completely such teaching, the arguments often used by the defenders of Christianity, and set forth by Us, especially in the encyclical letter Immortale Dei12 are of great avail; for by those arguments it is proved that, by a divine provision, all the rights which essentially belong to a society that is legitimate, supreme, and perfect in all its parts exist in the Church.
For instance, though nature commands all to contribute to the public peace and prosperity, whatever belongs to the manner, and circumstances, and conditions under which such service is to be rendered must be determined by the wisdom of men and not by nature herself. But where the power to command is wanting, or where a law is enacted contrary to reason, or to the eternal law, or to some ordinance of God, obedience is unlawful, lest, while obeying man, we become disobedient to God.
The Redeemer of mankind, Jesus Christ, having restored and exalted the original dignity of nature, vouchsafed special assistance to the will of man; and by the gifts of His grace here, and the promise of heavenly bliss hereafter, He raised it to a nobler state.